Emergency Powers in the Making by Miles Taylor

“Donald Trump’s desire to invoke one of the presidency’s most extraordinary, emergency powers is ten years in the making. I believe he will do it. And I believe we have real options to fight back.”

Miles Taylor, who once had worked for Trump during his first administration, presented this sobering piece of how his grasp on power came to being, how he would remain in power at any cost, and what tools we have left to pry him of that. Trump’s quest at fascism dates back ten years even though it has been revealed in the open once he took office the second time. We should use this to connect the dots and include the Insurrection of January 6th 2021 and his attempts at making a poster boy out of Minneapolis and Minnesota. It fits the rule where once a fascist grabs power, the only solution is extreme measures including a war. I hope we have other non-war measures that will work and according to Taylor, there are, as long as the window of opportunity is open.

*********

Donald Trump’s desire to invoke one of the presidency’s most extraordinary, emergency powers is ten years in the making. I believe he will do it. And I believe we have real options to fight back.
As news outlets reported this week, the White House is openly threatening to deploy U.S. troops into Minnesota under the Insurrection Act after protests erupted following the killing of Renee Nicole Good by an ICE agent. Federal forces have already flooded Minneapolis. The president is now warning that unless the state “stops the professional agitators and insurrectionists,” he will send in the military using one of his most extraordinary powers.

Contrary to the analysis of many pundits, this isn’t bluster. It’s the culmination of a nearly ten-year fixation I witnessed firsthand inside Donald Trump’s first administration.

Last night I went on Jen Psaki’s show on MSNOW to explain why this moment has been coming for a decade — and why Trump has always wanted to test the outer limits of his “apex” powers.
We’ve been here before. In fact, I watched Trump nearly invoke the Act — and talked him out of it.

I’ve written repeatedly about the Insurrection Act because I saw how dangerously close we came to it during Trump’s first term. Indeed, it was the very first thing I disclosed when I first came forward against the president ahead of his re-election campaign.

In 2019, while I was chief of staff at the Department of Homeland Security, Trump nearly used the Act to dramatically militarize the Southern Border, where he’d openly mused about repelling migrants by force, i.e. shooting them.

I got a phone call that tipped me off. Trump had just watched cable news footage of a migrant caravan approaching the Southern Border, and he was furious. Aides alerted me that he wanted to announce in his State of the Union address that he was sending the military to take over border security and to override any objection, law, or court.

Our lawyers told us this was madness. This didn’t rise to the level of a “foreign invasion.” Not even close. I agreed. What’s more, we feared that if he did this at the border, it would be a slippery slope: he’d send the military anywhere in the country that he wasn’t getting his way.

When the Secretary and I got to the White House, the President was practicing his speech in the Map Room. He greeted us with a grin, as if unable to hide his excitement at preparing to exercise a power he’d been told was one of the “break glass” emergency authorities of the presidency. We immediately set about convincing him this was the “wrong time” to do such a thing and the “wrong circumstances.”

What followed was a torturous night of ping pong. We enlisted the White House lawyers to help us persuade the boss. We called the Secretary of State. We phoned colleagues in the Government of Mexico to see what more they could do to tamp down the caravan. And when we persuaded him the situation was under control — and couldn’t possibly warrant the use of powers meant for wartime — he eventually (and begrudgingly) relented.

But after that moment, it was clear: he would try again.

In fact, he never let go of the idea. On other occasions in conversations with us, he referred almost wistfully to the Insurrection Act as his “magical authorities.” He believed — and still believes — that Article II of the U.S. Constitution allows him to do “whatever I want as President.”

Since returning to office, Trump has been trying to foment an “insurrection” or “rebellion” to justify emergency action. Last year I warned repeatedly that Donald Trump was edging toward this moment. He began experimenting in Los Angeles, pushing troops beyond their lawful support roles, daring the courts to stop him. The very day he announced he was sending the Marines into California last June, I wrote this:

This could be the beginning of Trump’s worst abuse of power. Who is to say he won’t send U.S. troops into each “Blue State” that opposes his policies? Or to shut down organizations he doesn’t like? Or to round up his critics?

That’s almost exactly what has happened since (including the White House putting in place measures to designate opposition groups and individuals as “domestic terrorists” and to charge his opponents with fake crimes). They tried to create the circumstances that would justify an invocation. They probed Los Angeles. They probed Chicago. They probed Washington, D.C. They probed Portland.

In each case, the opposition refused to play the role Trump and Stephen Miller wrote for them. Protests were loud but largely peaceful. And local officials kept order, meaning that suddenly invoking the Insurrection Act would not have passed the laugh test.

What’s more, the courts shot down those National Guard and troop deployments. From California to Washington, D.C., federal judges ruled that the president’s actions were flat-out unconstitutional. On New Year’s Eve, Trump quietly and ruefully said he was withdrawing the National Guard — but hinted ominously at what was to come.

Perversely, those rulings only accelerated his interest in the Insurrection Act, the one statute that could give him a colorable excuse to send the military back in and make it harder for the courts to constrain him.

Here’s why Minnesota might be different. Knowing these people, I strongly suspect the Trump administration studied the map of American unrest the way a fire inspector studies old burn scars on a building’s walls. That’s why cities with a big protest history (LA, DC, Chicago, Portland) were up first. But they didn’t deliver.

Then, White House aides remembered 2020. Specifically, I imagine they recalled how the George Floyd protests in Minneapolis became a national symbol at the end of Trump’s first term, and they knew it could be a potential powder keg.

So they poured in thousands of federal agents, under the flimsy excuse that kindergartens run by Somali-Americans were rife with fraud — as if that’s the type of national security threat that requires shock troops instead of investigative accountants. The tension rose the past few weeks, by design. Then an ICE agent shot and killed Renee Nicole Good. While I don’t believe her death was part of some scripted plot, the confrontational posture made such a tragedy more likely.

Now the White House is gathering the visuals it was hoping for. They’re asking ICE officers to grab street footage for them, too, in an effort to document clashes, grieving crowds, and a state under pressure. Trump’s message is predictable and pre-planned: Nothing can fix this but the U.S. military.

Trump’s use of the Insurrection Act would surely be illegal. Here are a few ways I think we can stop him.
The Insurrection Act was written in 1807 to repel invasions and suppress genuine rebellions. It is meant to be a last resort when states cannot protect constitutional rights or enforce federal law. Minnesota does not meet that standard, by any stretch of the imagination. The state retains full control of its own National Guard, local police and courts are functioning, there’s no observable “insurrection” in sight.

In fact, using the Act there would invert its purpose. The federal government would be deploying troops against a state that is capable of maintaining order, simply because the president dislikes its politics. Courts should absolutely strike this down. But Trump has never treated the law as a guardrail, and he’s counting on the fact that federal courts will be slow to respond.

Despair is exactly what the White House wants. However, there are practical, powerful steps federal, state, and local leaders can take to check Trump’s wayward use of his presidential power if he invokes the Act.

First, Minnesota should sue and strip away the pretext. The governor and attorney general could seek a declaratory judgment that the Insurrection Act’s conditions are not met and that the state retains primary authority over public safety. Minnesota should simultaneously build the factual record: activated National Guard units under state control, mutual-aid agreements, functioning courts, and certifications from law-enforcement leaders that order can be maintained. A formal declaration of capacity would gut Trump’s claim that only the U.S. military can restore peace.

Second, other states MUST move together. It’s time for the governors to have an emergency summit. Illinois, California, Oregon, and others should file parallel briefs stating they will not consent to federal military policing within their borders and will challenge any similar deployment. Governors should convene in emergency session to adopt a joint compact defending federalism and coordinate Guard resources so no state can be isolated and bullied. Unity is a legal shield and a political deterrent, and we are LONG overdue for the governors to come together to show that.

Third, Congress must put the military on notice, immediately. Members should announce they will open Congressional investigations into any manifestly unlawful orders issued under a sham invocation of the Act, with inspectors general requests and committee subpoenas ready to go. Uniformed leaders need to hear, before a single deployment, that obedience to manifestly illegal commands carries personal and institutional consequences. This is not intimidation; it’s a reminder of their oath to the Constitution.

Fourth, impeachment must begin the moment he acts. Even if today’s GOP majority in the House blocks impeachment proceedings, opposition Members of Congress should file articles of impeachment and create the constitutional record that courts and future Congresses will rely upon. Silence would be treated as acquiescence. And if Democrats retake Congress, those proceedings can and must resume where they left off. Donald Trump fears impeachment if he loses the midterms, and he should.

Fifth — and most importantly — this would be a moment for mass civic resistance. If U.S. troops are sent against an American state, the response must be the largest peaceful mobilization in our history. By that, I mean coordinated marches in every state capital and cities large and small, labor walkouts, faith leaders in the streets, veterans standing between soldiers and citizens, mayors opening city halls for lawful assembly, and more. Trump is portraying the opposition as “terrorists” and “insurrectionists”; millions of calm Americans can shatter that illusion overnight.

This is not an exhaustive list. There’s a great deal more that can be done. And in the coming days and weeks, those options will be fleshed out. What we cannot do, though, is be lulled into a false sense of comfort that this is another Trump “joke” and not the real thing. We have to be ready.

Like I’ve said, again and again, Trump has been rehearsing this play for a decade. I watched the dress rehearsals. This time he believes the stage is set. But it isn’t, unless we surrender it to him. The Constitution still works when Americans use it, and the United States won’t become a despotism unless we allow it to be one.

Before that ever happens, we have options to fight back — lawfully, peacefully, and defiantly.

*************************

The Files just created a page solely for the topic on Trump, which include a wide array of sections from key terms, to the Endgame, the origins of fascism, and even the protests to date. It includes the campaigns to stop Project 2025 and boycott anything that supports Trump. Click on the window below and check it out. You can also find it in the menu section:

Trump 2.0 and Ways to End It

Keep in mind that more posts about this will come on a regular basis, including a series on Stories from Minnesota, a real-life account of the ICE atrocities from people affected there. You can contribute your stories by using the contact information here.

*****************************

Proud sponsor of the

And DEI

Click on the symbols above to find out how to participate.

Stories from Minnesota: Part 4

Photo by Stephen Fischer on Pexels.com

Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey has called the deployment “wildly disproportionate” and a massive waste of taxpayer dollars, noting “at times, there are as many as 50 agents arresting one person.” City Council President Elliott Payne put it succinctly: “This is a military occupation, and it feels like a military occupation.”

Carin Mrotz, Minneapolis resident and Senior Advisor in the Minnesota Attorney General’s Office, posted her stories about the ICE atrocities in the Twin Cities in social media before it was taken down. Her account is being featured here so that you have another account of what is happening, bringing this to full view:

**********

“A post for my friends and family outside of Minneapolis. There is a lot of misinformation flying around and I want to share my perspective if it’s useful or compelling or helps cut through the clickbait and profiteering.

Over the past several weeks, thousands of ICE agents have been deployed to the Twin Cities and more are expected this week. There are currently more ICE agents than local law enforcement in the metro area. In some places they are visiting businesses that are likely to employ or serve immigrants looking for people to arrest. In some places they are camping out in cars on highway exit ramps and pulling over drivers they believe look like they could be immigrants.

In neighborhoods like mine that are primarily residential with few business corridors, they are staging targeted raids of homes. But they mix it up, yesterday they were driving around the neighborhood and a neighbor reported that an agent pulled over and asked her husband, who was out walking the dog, if he was a US citizen.

Yesterday morning I received a text in my neighborhood group chat that more than a dozen agents were staging outside of a house a few blocks away, legal observers were needed. I put on boots and drove over to a home near our middle school and found the street full of SUVs and men in militarized but not standardized gear with big “POLICE” labels all over them. These men were carrying big guns.

Several of my friends had already been maced and one of the agents was spraying mace into a crowd of observers as casually as a dad might spray his lawn with a hose in the summer. The agents brandished their guns at us a warning, or a threat, maybe both. Neighbors stood on the front lawns and blew whistles or banged on drums and asked to see the agents’ warrant. ICE is not supposed to be able to enter a home without a judicial warrant, which is a warrant signed by a judge. If you are a law and order person, that might mean something to you.

Yesterday, after a few minutes of arguing with neighbors, 10-15 agents mustered and broke down the door of the single family home. They entered and after a few minutes, they re-emerged with a tall Black man in a tee shirt, shorts, an unzipped hoodie, and rubber slides. They led him to their vehicle. It was about 15 degrees out. His wife stood on the front lawn, begging to know why they took him. Behind her the front door stood broken, offering no security to a house full of family members, including children.

Several of us observers asked to see the warrant, and I took a picture. I will not share it out of concern for the man’s privacy, but it was an administrative warrant, signed by an ice agent, not a judge. If it matters to you that residents follow the law in engaging with our occupying agents, this should matter to you. If you are a law and order person, you might consider that what I witnessed was an abduction, not an arrest.

Across the Twin Cities, raids like this continued all day. On the southside, ICE agents surrounded a legal observer in her vehicle, broke the windows, and dragged her and her passenger out of the car and detained them. Everyone I know knows someone who has either had a relative (or multiple relatives) taken or has been a witness to one of these abductions. The pace of the operations has been relentless, manic, and the agents are acting with remarkable brutality.

Yesterday, as one of my neighbors attended to another who’d been sprayed with mace, pouring clean water in her eyes on the icy sidewalk in below freezing temps, her mother stood nearby on the phone with MPD, asking them to send someone to help. I don’t know if their decision not to was strategic or just simply about capacity, no local law enforcement has been present at any of the operations I’ve witnessed.

If you are someone who believes that you should absolutely just do whatever law enforcement tells you to do and you will be safe and respected, I would ask if you’ve ever had big guns drawn on you by someone yelling orders at you, those orders sometimes conflicting and unclear. And what if they were also spraying you with chemical irritants in 15 degree weather. If someone maced you for blowing a whistle at them, how confident are you in their ability to calmly follow procedure and not shoot you?

This summer our House Speaker Emerita and her husband were murdered in their home by someone impersonating a police officer. How confident are you that you could make sense of the meanings and markings of a uniform under stress? If armed men filled your street and broke down your neighbor’s door without a warrant, how confident are you that you could stay calm? These are questions we are asking ourselves constantly.

I have a lot of opinions about why this is happening, why Minnesota has been targeted and why our elected leaders are making the decisions they are and what will happen next, but this post is primarily to level set and let you know what’s going on. Because I also want you to know how we are responding.

First, I want to say that my experiences are those of a white professional who is not at risk for deportation. Immigrants and people afraid of being mistaken for immigrants are having a different set of experiences. ICE has been putting detainees on planes and sending them to places like Texas before their families can even hire lawyers or find out where their loved ones have been taken.

People are afraid and avoiding leaving their homes, even to get groceries. After ICE tear-gassed parents and school staff at a local high school last week, our public schools closed and have now re-opened with hybrid learning so that parents who are afraid to send their kids to school have an option.

Neighbors are organizing to protect and care for each other. We observe and document raids. We show up at schools at dropoff and pickup time, we pick up groceries for those who are staying home. Some of the muscle memory of the neighborhood watches we formed during the uprising 5 and a half years ago has reengaged. The Twin Cities is connected and resilient and pissed off and will continue to protect each other.

That is the important thing to know right now: Our cities are under occupation and we are being attacked by our federal government. And we are tenacious and we love each other and we will continue to protect each other. We will continue to blow whistles and bang pots and pans to alert our neighbors that ICE is nearby. We will continue to argue with them and waste their time knowing that someone else will have 15 more minutes to get away. We will continue to share videos of them slipping and falling on their asses on the icy walks and we will laugh hard at them. We have legal tools to fight them and we also have our long history of organizing and resistance.” — Carin Mrotz

This post was from January 12th. Thank you for bringing this to our attention.

The Files has created a page on Trump 2.0, which includes stories, terminology and campaigns to end his regime and with that, Project 2025. You can find it here and in the Menu section:

Trump 2.0 and Ways to End It