The Foreign Machine Behind MAGA: When the Curtain Finally Falls

When Bezmenov in the 1970s and 80s warned us that the Soviet Union was trying to undermine America by planting the seeds of discontent, only a few paid much attention. Now we should have known that. America is divided and on the brink of a civil war. The warnings of people acting in Russia’s interest are there. And not just through people, like Trump and members of Project 2025. The mouthpiece seems to come from other countries, whose groups are louder than most MAGA. And Tony Pentimalli explains the dangers behind this and sends a clear cut warning to Europe to beware of this hidden propaganda.

***********

Pull back the curtain and the illusion collapses. For years, MAGA sold the image of a swelling grassroots army of patriotic Americans fighting to take their country back, a movement powered by truckers in Ohio, retirees in Florida, and factory workers in Pennsylvania. But the moment X rolled out its new account location transparency feature, the truth snapped into focus. Behind the flags and Bible verses and eagle emojis were not millions of everyday Americans. They were operators sitting in Nigeria, Eastern Europe, India, Thailand, and other places, running some of the loudest MAGA accounts in existence. The mask did not slip. It fell.

The exposure was immediate and startling. A massive MAGA aggregation account with nearly four hundred thousand followers was traced to Eastern Europe. An Ivanka Trump fan account with more than a million followers was revealed to be based in Nigeria. Dozens of other prominent accounts that had long styled themselves as ordinary American voices suddenly appeared as foreign-based the instant the feature went live. While no verified total exists that captures every such account or their combined follower reach, public reporting confirmed that the scale was meaningful and far from fringe. A nontrivial portion of MAGA’s digital influence originates outside the United States.

Make no mistake, this is not incidental. Donald Trump has repeatedly amplified foreign-based MAGA accounts through retweets and direct engagement, integrating their content into the core bloodstream of his political influence. He benefits from their volume, their outrage, and their spectacle. That means foreign-origin content is not simply tolerated. It is actively rewarded.

The platform itself bears direct responsibility not for revealing the problem, but for building the system that allowed it to thrive uninterrupted for years. Under Elon Musk’s leadership, X had long rewarded anonymous political amplification with reach, revenue, and legitimacy without meaningful verification or labeling. The later rollout of the “About This Account” location feature merely converted hidden architecture into visible evidence. Even after that exposure, enforcement remained minimal, monetization continued, and no serious corrective framework followed. The platform acknowledged technical imperfections such as IP and VPN distortions, but it did not dismantle the revenue engine that made foreign political impersonation profitable. Transparency arrived without consequence, and that failure of consequence is where institutional responsibility now squarely rests.

Foreign operators thrive in this ecosystem because MAGA is engineered for exploitation. A movement built on grievance, fear, and permanent outrage is a magnet for opportunists. A community trained to distrust institutions while worshiping anonymous avatars is easy prey. A political leader who rewards flattery with amplification creates instant power for anyone who feeds his narrative. The pipeline is straightforward and dangerous. Content created overseas moves instantly into American political life with presidential validation.

This is how authoritarian ecosystems evolve. They do not rely on citizenship or truth or shared civic obligation. They rely on spectacle, on repetition, on the frictionless spread of emotional manipulation. The fact that foreign operators can shape MAGA discourse so easily is not a testament to foreign sophistication. It is proof of domestic vulnerability. A movement built on illusion will always be governed by whoever learns to pull the levers fastest.

History is unambiguous on this point. Democracies decay not only from invasion but from corrosion. Propaganda has always crossed borders. What distinguishes a healthy democracy is its resistance to it. Today, that resistance is failing. A former president benefits from foreign amplification. A right-wing media ecosystem refuses to acknowledge the exposure. A dominant social platform financially incentivizes extremism. The result is not just infiltration. It is the slow erosion of civic reality itself.

The emotional cost is no longer abstract. When Americans argue with MAGA accounts, many are no longer arguing with other Americans. When families cite viral posts to justify distrust of elections, contempt for immigrants, or hostility toward democratic institutions, those scripts may originate thousands of miles away. When election workers are harassed, journalists threatened, and judges targeted, the rhetorical fuel often traces back to unverified digital sources that Americans assume are domestic voices. A democracy fractures when its citizens unknowingly outsource their political imagination to people who do not live within the system they are destabilizing.

What this has done to the American interior is incalculable. It has broken living rooms and Thanksgiving tables. It has turned parents and children into strangers, siblings into ideological enemies, lifelong friends into social casualties. Millions of Americans now live inside parallel realities that no longer intersect. Trust in elections, in medicine, in journalism, in neighbors has been poisoned at scale. The country has not merely been polarized. It has been psychologically reshaped. A decade of algorithmic distortion, foreign amplification, and cynical political exploitation has rewired how Americans perceive truth, authority, and one another. This was not just influence. It was mass manipulation, and we are only beginning to take stock of the damage.

The institutional stakes are even higher. A nation cannot sustain democratic legitimacy when its political identity can be impersonated at scale by external profiteers. Accountability collapses when influence is detached from citizenship. Authentic participation becomes indistinguishable from counterfeit activism. The boundary between political voice and foreign masquerade dissolves.

This moment demands more than recognition. It demands action. Americans must insist on real transparency about who is shaping political discourse online. Platforms must be forced to clearly disclose foreign operation of political accounts in political spaces. Revenue sharing systems that reward foreign political manipulation must be audited and restrained. Federal institutions must treat foreign-run political influence not as a social media novelty but as a national security risk.

We can no longer reduce this to a culture war or a partisan feud. This is a sovereignty crisis. It is a truth crisis. It is a vulnerability crisis. A foreign machine is helping write America’s political script, and too many remain captivated by the performance without ever demanding to see who is operating the controls. The curtain has already been pulled back. What remains is the harder decision of whether Americans are willing to act on what they can now plainly see.

Proud sponsor of the campaign

Click on the logo above to learn more about it and participate. A new list was produced that has companies that are opposed to Trump and still support DEI initiatives. Click on the letters below to learn more about them:

DEI

Please get the word out for others to participate!

Germany’s Christmas markets grapple with soaring security costs

Marketing body says costs jumped 44% over past three years

Germany’s Christmas markets grapple with soaring security costs

Germany is grappling with higher costs for security measures for the Christmas markets in light of the massacre at the one in Magdeburg last year. Details in this CDE News article.

🎄 THE FLENSBURG FILES

Removing Immigrants would be a National Security Threat.

Here’s a Denkzettel to all parties in Europe wishing to rid their countries of immigrants: You’re only destroying it. And how can a country function without immigrants? I bet my last Euro no plan exists regardless of which country or region. . None of the parties thought about it thoroughly, not even the far-right parties.

In the United States, Trump’s policies are impacting the way the country works in general. Thanks to ICE Raids, wrongful incarcerations and deportations to countries thousands of miles away from home, the number of immigrants have dwindled, regardless of status. And with that the destruction that will take years or even decades to rebuild.

Keith Davenport in his piece describes in detail how removing immigrants can (and has) become a national security threat to the US.

Thinking about Remigration? You better know what you are getting into.

********

Would Removing All Legal Immigrants from the United States Be a Threat to National Security?

Yes. Absolutely. Without question.

And the evidence isn’t political — it’s structural, economic, demographic, and military.

If every legal immigrant vanished overnight, America would not be safer.

It would be weaker, poorer, less stable, and less secure.

Not metaphorically.

Not symbolically.

Directly. Immediately. Catastrophically.

Here’s why, backed by real data:

✅ 1. National security begins with economic strength — and removing immigrants would collapse the U.S. economy

Every Pentagon planning document, every CIA National Intelligence Estimate, and every bipartisan national-security commission affirms the same truth:

Economic power IS national power.

If you remove legal immigrants, you remove:

• 20% of America’s workforce

• 29% of U.S. physicians

• 15% of registered nurses

• 23% of home-health and elder-care workers

• Up to 40% of construction workers in key states

• Roughly half of U.S. agricultural labor

• A huge share of workers in STEM, cybersecurity, logistics, and research

You don’t just “slow” the economy — you cripple it.

And when the economy collapses, so does:

• Defense manufacturing

• Supply chains

• Military recruitment pools

• Intelligence operations

• Emergency response capability

• Global competitiveness

A nation with a crippled economy cannot defend itself or project power abroad.

✅ 2. Removing legal immigrants would devastate the U.S. military

Immigrants — including green-card holders — serve honorably in the U.S. Armed Forces.

They fill critical roles in:

• Cyber defense

• Linguistics

• Intelligence analysis

• Technical support

• Medical units

Naturalized citizens also reenlist at higher-than-average rates.

And the intelligence community relies heavily on:

• Bilingual analysts

• Cultural experts

• Diaspora networks

• Regional fluency

Remove these individuals, and you eliminate capabilities that take decades to rebuild.

✅ 3. The U.S. food supply becomes insecure — a direct national-security threat

Food security IS national security.

If immigrants vanished, you would immediately see:

• Crops rotting in fields

• Dairy and livestock operations shutting down

• Food processing plants going dark

• Supply chains slowing to a crawl

You don’t just get higher prices — you get instability.

A country that can’t feed itself becomes strategically vulnerable.

✅ 4. Health-care collapse is a national-security disaster

The numbers speak for themselves:

• 29% of physicians

• 15% of RNs

• 23%+ of elder-care, psychiatric, and home-health workers

These are largely legal immigrants.

If they disappear:

• ERs back up

• Surgeries are delayed

• Elder-care collapses

• Hospital staffing implodes

• Disaster response weakens

DHS, FEMA, and the Pentagon all classify a weakened health-care system as a national-security threat.

✅ 5. Removing immigrants accelerates population decline — a strategic vulnerability

Great powers fall when:

• Their workforce shrinks

• Their population ages

• They cannot replenish human capital

Russia, China, Japan, and parts of Europe are already facing this crisis.

The United States avoids it because of immigration.

Remove legal immigrants and America becomes:

• Older

• Less innovative

• Economically weaker

• Less able to fund Social Security & Medicare

• Less competitive globally

Pentagon war planners factor population strength into strategy for a reason.

A shrinking nation is a weakening nation.

✅ 6. Diplomacy, intelligence, and global influence collapse

Immigrants provide the U.S. with:

• Language advantages

• Intelligence insights

• Trade links

• Diplomatic bridges

• Cultural knowledge

Remove them and America becomes strategically blind in many regions — especially Asia, the Middle East, Africa, and Latin America.

That is a catastrophic intelligence failure.

📌 Bottom Line

Removing all legal immigrants would create a national-security crisis across every dimension of American power:

• Economic — collapse

• Military — reduced capability

• Agricultural — food insecurity

• Technological — innovation decline

• Demographic — population implosion

• Intelligence — loss of global insight

• Medical — weakened hospitals and response systems

• Diplomatic — diminished influence

The United States would become:

• Economically crippled

• Militarily weakened

• Diplomatically isolated

• Demographically declining

• Less secure at home and abroad

Yes — removing legal immigrants would profoundly, directly, and immediately undermine U.S. national security.

**************

Proud sponsor of the campaign

Click on the logo above to learn more about it and participate. A new list was produced that has companies that are opposed to Trump and still support DEI initiatives. Click on the letters below to learn more about them:

DEI

Please get the word out for others to participate!

Protesting Together as a Family, for the Families

What are we going to tell our kids and grandkids about what we have experienced? How will we explain ourselves of where we stood and how we fought? This period of time has become nothing short of volatile and when this era is replaced with something more peaceful, we will have a lot to say about what we did and how we did. All of us will have taken part, no matter what age or background. And all of us will have some stories to share….

…like this one by Lee Goodman. He took his grandson to one of the protests outside an ICE Detention Center so that they too could protest the unwarranted arrests and cruel punishments of those who were of the wrong type. What happened afterwards is something I can imagine with others. A chance to learn more from one who experienced the protests up close and personal. Here’s his story behind it and many thanks for allowing this reshare……

***************

My 11-year-old grandson came with me to protest outside the ICE detention center at Broadview, Illinois. He has been asking for a while and is out of school this week because of Thanksgiving, so after clearing it with his mom, I said OK.

But first I took him for his 6-month dental appointment. The hygienist said he has been doing a good job of brushing but needs to do better at flossing.

We stood outside the ICE facility holding signs. Just a few other protesters were there. The only new development is that a public works crew was removing the concrete barriers from the main road leading to the facility. They were placed there when the village designated where protesters could and could not assemble. I asked one of the police officers on the scene why the barriers were coming down, and he explained that winter is approaching and they have to be prepared to plow the street when it snows. He didn’t have to tell me what I already knew, that the protests have been peaceful and orderly, so there hasn’t been any need for the barriers for quite some time.

As we were driving home, I asked my grandson if he would write an essay about what we experienced today. He reads a lot, and I wanted to encourage him to write more. I was also interested to learn what he thought and felt about our visit. He agreed to write and share what he wrote with me. He’s an agreeable kid, and I had just bought him an ice cream.

Then he asked me if I was going to write about what we saw. He has read a couple of my reports and we have discussed them. I asked him what I should write about, and he said, “Me.” I asked why, and he said because everyone has family and they would be able to relate to a recounting of the day we spent protesting together.

So let me tell you about a man who showed up and started yelling at the ICE agents as they came and went from the facility. When the man realized he had been swearing in front of a child, he sheepishly said to me, “Sorry about the language,” but a few moments later, he resumed screaming profanities. My grandson and I walked a short distance away, and I said to him, “You’ve never heard those words before, have you?” He smiled and admitted that he had, at school. He then said he thought the man should consider who he is talking to when choosing his words, if he wants to influence people. Some people wouldn’t like the swear words, he said, so they wouldn’t listen to what he was saying.

As we stood by the road holding our signs for passing motorists to see, he suggested I bring a megaphone next time. I said, “I like it quiet.” He replied, “I know,” probably recalling the numerous times I have told him and his younger brother to settle down. I thought back many years to when I was about his age, sitting in a rowboat on a small lake, fishing with my dad. He liked it quiet, too.

“What’s the scariest protest you have been at?” my grandson asked. I told him that I don’t recall being scared at protests. “How do you know how effective the protest is?” he queried. I answered that you usually don’t. All that we know is that protests can make a difference, so we try. We talked a bit about other ways of making a difference, like writing letters to legislators.

It wasn’t the boy’s first protest. I have a photo somewhere of him when he was just under two years old, nestled in his grandmother’s arms. She was lying in the middle of Michigan Avenue in Chicago, along with hundreds of others who were calling for an end to gun violence.

Not many people noticed our protest today. But for a precious couple of hours, I was filled with hope.

**************

Proud sponsor of the campaign

Click on the logo above to learn more about it and participate. A new list was produced that has companies that are opposed to Trump and still support DEI initiatives. Click on the letters below to learn more about them:

DEI

Please get the word out for others to participate!